DetalleParticipacionPublica

Query
Closed
Range of the Standard:
Ministerial Order
Character of the query:
Policy
Type of participation:
Prior public consultation

Resumen

El Real Decreto 207/2022, de 22 de marzo, por el que se modifican diversas normas reglamentarias para ampliar la designación del Laboratorio de Metrología de Radiaciones Ionizantes del Centro de Investigaciones Energéticas, Medioambientales y Tecnológicas (CIEMAT) y del Laboratorio Central Oficial de Electrotecnia de la Fundación para el Fomento de la Innovación Industrial, depositarios de patrones nacionales de medida, amplió el campo de designación a la magnitud fluencia neutrónica y a la magnitud corriente eléctrica para valores superiores a 1 000 A en corriente alterna de baja frecuencia e impulsional, respectivamente.

Problems to be solved with the new standard

This policy proposal intends to declare new national patterns, once it has been extended the appointment of the aforementioned laboratories, with the aim of responding to the needs of metrological traceability in radiological monitoring and electric energy, industrial and test.

Need and opportunity for approval

The need for adopting this order is to declare new patterns mentioned and providing the company metrological traceability of its actions in these new patterns.

Objectives of the norm

Establish the definition of national standards of units of fluency and neutron electric flow to values over 1 000 To alternating current in low-frequency impulsional.

Possible alternative solutions, regulatory and non-regulatory

Not to carry out the policy proposal

Remission deadline

Deadline for submitting arguments from the day Friday, May 20, 2022 until the day Friday, June 3, 2022

Submission of allegations

The allegations may be referred to the email address: patronesnacionales@cem.es

Will only be considered responses in which the sender relates to state, in:

  • Name and surname/name of the participant
  • Organization or association (if applicable)
  • Contact (email)

In general, the contributions received are considered likely to be made public. The parts of the information provided that, in the opinion of the person concerned should be treated confidentially and consequently is not free dissemination, should be specifically identified in the text of the contribution, not to be regarded as the generic messages confidentiality of information.